Four of the strangest trademark cases of all time

 

Trademark battles can be complicated, confusing, and sometimes downright bizarre. Here is our look at  four of the strangest cases of all time.

 

Louis Vuitton Vs Louis Vuiton Dak

 

This is probably the first time luxury handbags and fried chicken have featured mentioned in the same case. LV decided to sue the fried chicken restaurant located in South Korea, which had named itself ‘Louis Vuiton Dak’, a play on the Korean word ‘Tongdak’ which means ‘whole chicken’. Unfortunately for the owner, he hadn’t done himself any favours by also creating a logo that looked suspiciously similar to the LV logo. In the end, restaurant owner was fined $12,500!

 

KFC Vs a country club in Yorkshire

 

Tracy Daly is the owner of a country club in Yorkshire Dales. As part of her Christmas Day menu, she advertised an item called the ‘Family Feast’. The problem was that the same slogan is used by KFC for a decidedly non seasonal meal of fried chicken and chips, plus a fizzy drink. KFC contacted Ms. Daly, asking her to remove the title, on the grounds it was a serious trademark infringement. KFC has since confirmed they won’t be taking the case any further, since there is little resemblance between the two menus.

 

Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v. Cadbury UK Limited

 

 

The loss of Cadbury’s battle against its rival Nestle is probably one of the most famous trademark- infringement cases of all time. Cadbury had attempted to register a trademark for the use of a specific shade of the colour purple. Lawyers from Nestlé finally managed to overturn the judgement in October 2014. The judge decided the application lacked clarity, to the delight of Nestlé and anyone else who was especially fond of magenta.

 

Wal-Mart Vs Converse

 


The Converse trademark-infringement story started with the company filing a suit against 30 companies including Walmart, Kmart, Sketchers, Fila, Also, and Ralph Lauren. While most of the brands decided to settle, Wal-Mart has decided to fight back, claiming that what converse claim to own is for aesthetic functions only and can’t be subject to a trademark protection. Walmart won the battle. The judge stated that parts of the Converse style can’t be protected. As long as they don’t have the diamond sole, companies can import and sell shoes that look similar.

Popular posts from this blog

New WordPress plugin for online internationtrademark services

  During 2020 we’ve been working on a lot of new trademark functionality, covering search, filing, watching, and record management. With a lot of interest from firms wanting to offer trademark services online, particularly filing and fee quotations. As well as adding this functionality to a site using LawPanel’s APIs we have an even easier and quicker integration for WordPress sites using our new plugin. See it in action on  Trade Mark Direct Network  a new service focussed on easy international filings in any country, but with a particular focus on the EU, UK (now requiring separate registration after Brexit), USA and Canada, Australia and key European countries, with more to follow including online WIPO fee and ordering. This will be the first online calculator fo giving fee estimates for advice and search fees, as well as official fees.
Read more

IP software and intensity of use

Some firms think that licensing IP software means they have the software and innovation boxes ticked. Not so. What matters is how much the software is used, by how many, and how fully. If the answer is 'not much', it's the wrong solution. With the right one there's plenty of scope to do things more easily, efficiently, and better for clients.  The term 'IP software' covers a wide range of tools and capabilities. Some older systems are stand alone clunky docketing databases. Others run only automated clearance searches. And others, unlike these point solutions, are platforms with a depth and breadth of capabilities. Old clunky docketing databases are a single point solution for tracking deadlines of registered marks and designs. So are often only used by one or two formalities administrators. The intensity of use of this IP software is low when considered against a whole IP team with lawyers and attorneys, as well as clients, associates, and other IP team members...
Read more

Beyond docketing

  Many firms and in-house counsel think of ‘IP software’ and ‘docketing database’ as interchangeable terms. Which is understandable as software tools for IP have only ever kept track of registry deadlines. With some add ons to assist with filing and checking local records in the docketing database against official ones at the registry. With Covid we’re seeing expectations change significantly. Firms of all sizes want better tools that do more. Not just to support work from home, but to reduce work and improve client service. For the full lifecycle of an IP right.  From on platform automated clearance searches for trademarks. Online forms for instructing searches and client areas to see results. Through automatic tracking of application status, built in watching and client tools for monitoring and reporting. And so much more. All of which reduce cognitive load and time, and improve client and user experience. Contact us now for a test drive.
Read more